June 26, 2014

The Sugar Association voiced its objection to the use of the term “added sugars,” noting it is misleading and without scientific justification, in comments delivered today at a public meeting of the FDA concerning a proposed rule on updating the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP).

“The Association recognizes that one of FDA’s objectives is to assist consumers in making healthy food and beverage choices. However, we have serious concerns about the use of selective dietary guidance, from just one edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as the sole basis for proposing sweeping labeling regulation changes,” stated Andy Briscoe, president and CEO of The Sugar Association.

Briscoe noted that while general dietary guidance to increase or reduce certain foods has merit for the general population, there is not a preponderance of science as required by law, to support the “added sugars” recommendation.

Briscoe pointed to the Nutrition Evidence Library scientific literature reviews conducted by the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which did not find that “added sugars” intake contributes to nutrient displacement, displacement of nutrient-rich foods and, as FDA has stated in their proposed rule, obesity or heart disease.

The 2010 Dietary Guidelines specifically state that USDA Food Patterns suggested intakes “have not been tested for health benefits,” Briscoe told the FDA panel.

Briscoe also strongly emphasized that no authoritative scientific body, including the Institute of Medicine and European Food Safety Authority, has found a public health need to set an Upper Level for “added sugars” intake. Further, FDA’s own definition of healthy does not take sugars into consideration.

“The lack of science to justify ‘added sugars’ labeling and the fact that FDA must require every food and beverage manufacturer to keep written records on thousands of products in order to enforce this proposed regulation, sets a dangerous precedent for this and future labeling regulations,” Briscoe said.

“Therefore, we encourage the Agency to maintain its strong commitment to science and withdraw its ‘added sugars’ labeling proposal in the NFP Proposed Rule,” Briscoe concluded.

To view Briscoe’s testimony in its entirety, click here.

More Press Releases

the sugar association

Celebrate National Real Sugar Day on October 14

August 9, 2022

WASHINGTON, Aug. 9, 2022 – The Sugar Association (SAI) today announced the celebration of the first annual National Real Sugar Day, taking place October 14, 2022, as a day to celebrate real sugar with the people who bring it from farm to table and those individuals and families who enjoy it as part of a […]

the sugar association

New Evidence Submitted to FDA Supports Swift Action on Artificial Sweetener Labeling Reform; Labeling Rules Must Change to Corral Opaque System that Stymies Consumers

March 8, 2022

March 8, 2022 Washington, DC – The Sugar Association today submitted a supplemental petition to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to further support its call for sweeping reform of federal regulations governing the labeling of artificial sweeteners used in packaged foods. “FDA action on alternative sweetener labeling reform is long overdue, and we […]

the sugar association

10,000+ Consumers Join the Fight for Complete & Accurate Labeling of Artificial Sweeteners in Packaged Foods; FDA Must Act Now to Help Families Make Informed Decisions Regarding Sugar Substitutes

September 22, 2021

September 22, 2021 Washington, D.C. –  More than 10,000 consumers across the United States have joined the fight for sweeping reform of the government’s labeling regulations covering the use of alternative sweeteners in packaged food by signing an online petition urging the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to require food companies to place clear, […]

More Press Releases

Stay in Touch

Sign Up