June 26, 2014

The Sugar Association voiced its objection to the use of the term “added sugars,” noting it is misleading and without scientific justification, in comments delivered today at a public meeting of the FDA concerning a proposed rule on updating the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP).

“The Association recognizes that one of FDA’s objectives is to assist consumers in making healthy food and beverage choices. However, we have serious concerns about the use of selective dietary guidance, from just one edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as the sole basis for proposing sweeping labeling regulation changes,” stated Andy Briscoe, president and CEO of The Sugar Association.

Briscoe noted that while general dietary guidance to increase or reduce certain foods has merit for the general population, there is not a preponderance of science as required by law, to support the “added sugars” recommendation.

Briscoe pointed to the Nutrition Evidence Library scientific literature reviews conducted by the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which did not find that “added sugars” intake contributes to nutrient displacement, displacement of nutrient-rich foods and, as FDA has stated in their proposed rule, obesity or heart disease.

The 2010 Dietary Guidelines specifically state that USDA Food Patterns suggested intakes “have not been tested for health benefits,” Briscoe told the FDA panel.

Briscoe also strongly emphasized that no authoritative scientific body, including the Institute of Medicine and European Food Safety Authority, has found a public health need to set an Upper Level for “added sugars” intake. Further, FDA’s own definition of healthy does not take sugars into consideration.

“The lack of science to justify ‘added sugars’ labeling and the fact that FDA must require every food and beverage manufacturer to keep written records on thousands of products in order to enforce this proposed regulation, sets a dangerous precedent for this and future labeling regulations,” Briscoe said.

“Therefore, we encourage the Agency to maintain its strong commitment to science and withdraw its ‘added sugars’ labeling proposal in the NFP Proposed Rule,” Briscoe concluded.

To view Briscoe’s testimony in its entirety, click here.

More Press Releases

sugar-association logo

USDA school meals rule could decrease diet quality, expose kids to more artificial sweeteners

April 24, 2024

April 24, 2024 (Washington, DC) – While welcoming the alignment of school meals with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) and supporting the aim to limit added sugars to 10% of each week’s menu, the Sugar Association today (Wednesday) cautioned that imposing added sugars limits on individual products could limit access to nutrient-dense foods that […]

sugar-association logo

New WIC rule could decrease diet quality, further increase use of artificial sweeteners

April 9, 2024

April 9, 2024 (Washington, DC) – While welcoming the dietary balance and flexibility reflected in the new Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) rule announced today (Tuesday), the Sugar Association cautioned that added sugars limited on individual products could limit access to nutrient-dense foods that are associated with better overall diet […]

Sugar Industry Celebrates Through Giving this National Real Sugar Day

October 12, 2023

Highlighting real people, real plants, and real community impact WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Saturday, October 14, the Sugar Association (SAI), along with the organization’s 15 members, will celebrate the people and the plants that make real sugar possible on the second annual National Real Sugar Day. Alongside its member companies, the Sugar Association founded National Real Sugar Day as […]

More Press Releases

Stay in Touch

Sign Up