Proposal Compromises Agency’s Well‐Established Science-Based Principles

October 14, 2015, Washington, DC —The Sugar Association is raising serious concerns about the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) proposal to require an “added sugars” declaration and daily reference value (DRV) on the Nutrition Facts Label (NFL).

“FDA has not provided the scientific evidence to uphold its own statutory requirement that ‘added sugars’ labeling and a DRV for ‘added sugars’ is ‘necessary to assist consumers in maintaining healthy dietary practices,’” The Sugar Association stated in its comment provided to FDA this week.

The Sugar Association notes that in this rulemaking effort, FDA has openly admitted it has deviated from “factors traditionally considered for mandatory declaration” of nutrients on the NFL. The record shows that FDA has arbitrarily selected from general dietary guidance, science of low evidentiary value and unofficial, controversial reports like the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) Report to support its proposal for “added sugars” labeling and to set a DRV.

In addition, FDA’s own consumer research shows that should the Agency move forward with its “added sugars” labeling proposal it will mislead and confuse consumers.

The extraordinary contradictions and irregularities in this rulemaking process coupled with the use of scientific evidence of extremely low evidentiary value to propose “added sugars” labeling and a DRV is unprecedented for the FDA.

The Sugar Association points to the following specific concerns with the quality of scientific evidence and the irregularities in this rulemaking process used by the Agency to support its proposal:

“FDA has not provided evidence that, under section 403(q)(2)(A) of the Act, there is
sufficient scientific evidence of a compelling public health reason to modify the current ‘Sugars’ category to include ‘added sugars’ labeling and a set DRV for ‘added sugars.’ To reiterate, the Agency has not provided evidence that ‘added sugars’ labeling is necessary ‘to assist consumers in maintaining healthy dietary practices,’” The Sugar Association states.

“For the reasons outlined above, we ask FDA to withdraw its proposals to include ‘added sugars’ on the NFL and to set a DRV for ‘added sugars.’ Should FDA believe that ‘added sugars’ labeling is important, the Agency should follow its standard of sufficient scientific agreement and ask the Institute of Medicine to do a thorough review of the full body of scientific evidence (at the highest level of evidence available) on ‘added sugars’ intake,” The Sugar Association concludes.

To view The Sugar Association’s submitted comments in their entirety, click here.

More Press Releases

the sugar association

“Statement by Courtney Gaine, PhD, RD, president and CEO of the Sugar Association Regarding USDA Proposed Meal Standards”

February 3, 2023

As USDA undertakes its rulemaking for school meals with a focus on obesity reduction, it is important to note that added sugars consumption has actually declined by more than 30% since 2000 while child obesity is up by 45%.

the sugar association

National Real Sugar Day to Highlight Sugar from Farm to Table

October 5, 2022

Inaugural Celebration Spotlights Sugar’s Natural Origins from Sugar Beet and Sugar Cane Plants WASHINGTON, October 6, 2022 – Next week, the sugar industry will come together to mark the first annual National Real Sugar Day on October 14 as a day to celebrate real sugar with the people who bring it from farm to table […]

the sugar association

The Case is Clear – FDA Reform of Artificial Sweetener Labeling Requirements on Packaged Food is Long Overdue

September 22, 2022

Evidence shows alternative sweetener use is up 832% since 2000; experts and consumers urge agency to act on Citizen Petition calling for change

More Press Releases

Stay in Touch

Sign Up