‘Added sugars’ recommendations not based on preponderance of science as required by law

The Sugar Association is troubled by the lack of consistency in the scientific process and quality of evidence used by the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (Committee) as the basis for its Advisory Report to the Secretaries of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The Committee’s conclusions on “added sugars” intake are not based on the established evidence-based review process of the full body of science, which raises serious concerns the Committee bypassed this process and hand-picked science to support their pre-determined conclusions. Such an approach suggests that these conclusions were “opinion-based” and not “science-based.”

We strongly contend that leading the American public to believe there is an association between a dietary component and detrimental health outcomes requires a robust review of the entire body of high-quality scientific literature by experts in the field of investigation, not a few hand-picked reviews selected by scientists without carbohydrate or “sugars” expertise.

As cholesterol is getting a pass, it is clear that “added sugars” is the newest dietary target, with over 300 mentions in this report. The 2015 Committee, despite weak science, is now telling the American public that many of our health woes are caused by “added sugars” intake. As Dr. F. Edward Scarborough, former director of FDA’s Office of Food Labeling, so aptly stated in his comment regarding “added sugars” submitted to FDA on its proposed changes to the Nutrition Facts Panel:

We question the usefulness of a Dietary Guidelines process that continues to provide contradictory advice and ultimately confuses the American public. The Sugar Association will ask the Secretaries to maintain the integrity of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans process when the Departments write the final 2015 Dietary Guidelines. We ask that the Secretaries ensure the Guidelines are based solely on the preponderance of scientific information as mandated by Public Law 101.445, not hypotheticals, agendas, opinions or beliefs.

We maintain that all-natural sugar is an important ingredient that has been safely used for thousands of years. Sugar consumed in moderation – a level between restriction and indulgence – is an important part of a healthy diet and active lifestyle.

More Press Releases

Sugar Association Concerned About Misleading Labeling Effort

November 14, 2018

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In response to an announcement made by the American Medical Association to create front-of-package food warning labels that would mislead consumers, the Sugar Association President and CEO Courtney Gaine PhD, RD, issued the following statement: “The new nutrition facts label will now include added sugars, giving consumers the access to the amount […]

Sugar Association Advocates for Scientific Research, Fact-Based Education, and Enjoying Sweetness in Moderation

October 31, 2018

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In response to claims made by consumer activist and nutritionist Dr. Marion Nestle in her latest book, the Sugar Association President and CEO Dr. Courtney Gaine issued the following statement: “Throughout our history, the foundation of the Sugar Association has been scientific research as we seek to learn as much as possible […]

FDA Commissioner says agency revisiting confusing added sugars labeling rule

September 7, 2018

The Sugar Association applauds U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb for his September 6, 2018, statement recognizing the need to revisit the yet to be implemented rule requiring labeling of added sugars for single-ingredient sweeteners such as sugar, honey and maple syrup on the new Nutrition Facts Label (NFL).

More Press Releases

Stay in Touch

Sign Up

Get Social with #MoreToSugar